Kompasiana
Selasa, 07 Pebruari 2012

Filsafat

Jadikan Teman | Kirim Pesan

Awaluddin Madjid

yang mencoba terus untuk menulis ..

Pembenaran Terhadap Sebuah “Teori”

OPINI | 08 September 2010 | 22:23 138 12 1 dari 1 Kompasianer menilai Inspiratif

Not long ago I wrote in Kompasiana entitled “Hawking STEPEHEN CONCEPTS AND GOD”,

, From the writing, what’s his name appears:

1. agree with the differences of opinion, (the views, thoughts)

2. agrees with the difference assumption (that the allegations to be true)

3. agrees with the theory of difference (of opinion, which is basically the study, research, observation and / or the like)

4. equations agree with opinions, assumptions and theories of science and even science

5, did not agree because there are differences of views, assumptions, theories and science.

While the name “RIGHT” any existing classification, namely:

1. correctly according to the views, assumptions, theories and personal knowledge,

2. correctly according to the views, assumptions, theories and family science,

3. correctly according to the views, assumptions, theories and science groups,

4. correctly according to the views, assumptions, theories and knowledge of national,

5. correctly according to the views, assumptions, theories and international science

6. universally true,

view - the view that now is still in debate with each other. And of all the that, the fair - only natural and normal. Likewise when I wrote about the concept of Hawking and Lord (when I wrote about the Lord - ANY, my friend protested THAT IS NOT GOD Almighty Allah, and that too only natural that I consider, nevertheless we agreed to disagree)

That what I write, still has not moved with a view of what is called “theory”, because what is called theory of knowledge necessary to become a proof of the accuracy of the data and the fact that the parameters absyah, and I’m designing it with the basic direction - basic a matter of mathematics, physics, chemistry, biology, astronomy, economics and science - science that already exists as a take-off departure from what I am going to study, so as to reveal that what GOD IS TRUE AND REAL AND CAN scientifically proven.

Teoripun been developed, examples of theories about light from the Abu Ali Hasan Al Haitam, to Sir Isaac Newton in his theory Hypothesis of Light in a year in 1675, the theory of waves or Ray by Christiaab Huygens, Thomas Young’s theory of sound waves, Faraday in the year 1845 , and finally the Speed of Light theory which was discovered by Einstein, who wrote his papers on the photoelectric effect which is the forerunner to his discovery of the theory of relativity finally gave birth to the formula E = MC2 (squared)

Existing theories on the same discussion, but the experienced development - development that is so striking, although there are different basic side, that Abu Ali Hasan of basing penilitiaannya “

And verily We have sent down unto you the verses that shed light, and examples of previous people who were before you, and lessons for those who fear Allah.

God (Giver) light (to) the heavens and the earth. The Parable of His Light is as a niche, wherein is a lamp. Pelita it in the glass (and) the glass seemed to be a star (a luminous) like pearls, which is lit with oil from a blessed tree, (ie) no olive trees that grow on the east side (of something), nor on the west (it), whose oil (only)-nigh luminous, though no fire touched. Light on the light (in layers), God guides to His light whom He will, and God perpetrate the parables for mankind, and Allah knows all things.

(Sura 24 verses 34 and 35)

While others conduct research and observations are past, which finally found a reference that has been there, to count - a count that is necessary to examine the special nature.

Existing theory and human made is a process, even a theory created by God - even for some people is a process, yet more syahih science to do so because of unsubstantiated claims, rather than the theory of God.

When someone has an opinion, whether in the form of opinions, assumptions, conclusions as well as the nature of dogma, rose Shah - Shah course, because there are differences in thought patterns. There are, who based his paradigm based on REASON MIND, HEART new REASON, REASON AND FINALLY Behaviours said, There is a REASON REASON HEART USED TO NEW THINKING, speech and behavior, AND CAN ALSO IN OR back and forth.

Definition, I am currently writing several books, one titled “PESONA LIFE,” “I DID NOT WANT THE POOR”, “NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT INTEGRATED ECONOMIC (PESAT) AND ALSO WILL MENYELSAIKAN book entitled” THE POWER OF WORD AND NUMBER “, however what we feel, think, do give BENEFIT OF - THE AMOUNT FOR HUMAN LIFE AND NATURE COMPATIBLE WITH GOD CHANNEL.

From the circumstances, we agree to DIFFERENT OPINIONS ARE DIFFERENT IF WE ARE ALSO STILL Toh FRIEND, AND STILL WANT TO LEARN FROM MY anyone. BECAUSE WE CAN BE THE DIFFERENCE FROM THE REAL Lessons and factual, hereafter GOOD AND THE WORLD.

And clearly I MURDERER NOT GOD as we are told by Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche in The God Killer (Also Sprach Zarathustra) FOR DOING ON THE THEORY THAT THERE Justification, which have not become a real theory, AND FINALLY THE TRUTH AND THE TRUTH Stay TIME WILL PROVE THAT, we wait subsequent episodes.

And finally,

“HAPPY Iedul Fitri 1431 H, may Allah MAKING A NEW MAN AS OUR HEARTS ARE CLEAN, THE MIND AND spoken unmannerly BE USEFUL FOR Hereafter AND THE WORLD”


 
Tulis Tanggapan Anda
Guest User



SUBSCRIBE AND FOLLOW KOMPASIANA:

About Kompasiana | Terms & Conditions | Tutorial | FAQ | Contact Us | Kompasiana Toolbar RSS
KOMPAS.com
© 2008 – 2012